Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Drift from field crop sprayers using an integrated approach: Results of a five-year study

    Research output: Contribution to journalA1: Web of Science-articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Spray drift continues to be a major problem in applying agricultural pesticides. This paper summarizes the results of a 5 year study about drift from field crop sprayers using a unique integrated approach.
    Indirect (spray quality and wind tunnel measurements) and direct drift experiments (field drift experiments) were performed and drift models were developed to study the effect of spray application technique, droplet characteristics, buffer zones, meteorological conditions, spray liquid properties, border structures and crop characteristics on drift from field crop sprayers. It was found that indirect drift measurements can be a valuable alternative to field drift experiments. A validated 3-D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) mechanistic drift model was developed which can be used for a systemic study of different influencing factors. This model was reduced to a fast 2-D diffusion advection model useful as a hands-on drift prediction tool. From the experiments as well as from the models, the fraction of small droplets and the spray boom height were found to be the most influential spray application factors. Moreover, meteorological conditions as well as crop characteristics have an important effect on the amount of spray drift which can be reduced significantly using intercepting screens or buffer zones. From this study, drift protocols, data and models are made available which help to understand and reduce the complex phenomena of spray drift.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalTransactions of the ASABE
    Volume54
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)403-408
    Number of pages6
    ISSN2151-0032
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Drift from field crop sprayers using an integrated approach: Results of a five-year study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this