Projects per year
Abstract
Purpose The paper analyzes the decision-making process on whether or not to commercialize genetically modified (GM) crops in the current EU environment, for several agriculture industry sectors. This cross-industry analysis provides us insights in the (future) market dynamics of GM crop (applications) in the EU environment.
Methods Agribusiness stakeholders of six agricultural industry sectors were interviewed on their GM policy, using a semi-structured interview guide. This data were analyzed by content analysis. Principal results The cross-industry analysis on GM policies between companies belonging to the same and to different agriculture industry sectors, unveils several alignments of common central arguments in their decision-making processes that precede this actual GM business policy. Accordingly, three strong hypothetical policy congruities were identified, between (1) the agricultural biotechnology and compound feed industry, who’s policies are motivated by their conviction that GM imports are a by-default reality in the EU, (2) between NGO’s and the organic industry, who’s policy is driven by their pursued agricultural ideals (that oppose both to the current (globalizing)
agricultural system and to GM crops as they reinforce this system), and (3) between all the food actors, who’s GM business policy is primarily motivated from a (black-or-white) marketing consideration. Finally, our insights (1) highlight the “talking at cross-purposes” in the GM debate between different agriculture industry sectors, and (2) unveil several underlying reasons
for the locked-in situation with GM crops in the current EU environment.
Methods Agribusiness stakeholders of six agricultural industry sectors were interviewed on their GM policy, using a semi-structured interview guide. This data were analyzed by content analysis. Principal results The cross-industry analysis on GM policies between companies belonging to the same and to different agriculture industry sectors, unveils several alignments of common central arguments in their decision-making processes that precede this actual GM business policy. Accordingly, three strong hypothetical policy congruities were identified, between (1) the agricultural biotechnology and compound feed industry, who’s policies are motivated by their conviction that GM imports are a by-default reality in the EU, (2) between NGO’s and the organic industry, who’s policy is driven by their pursued agricultural ideals (that oppose both to the current (globalizing)
agricultural system and to GM crops as they reinforce this system), and (3) between all the food actors, who’s GM business policy is primarily motivated from a (black-or-white) marketing consideration. Finally, our insights (1) highlight the “talking at cross-purposes” in the GM debate between different agriculture industry sectors, and (2) unveil several underlying reasons
for the locked-in situation with GM crops in the current EU environment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 21-Jul-2013 |
| Event | IFMA 19th Congress: Transforming agriculture – between policy, science and the consumer - Warsaw, Poland Duration: 21-Jul-2013 → 26-Jul-2013 http://www.ifma19.org/ |
Conference
| Conference | IFMA 19th Congress: Transforming agriculture – between policy, science and the consumer |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Poland |
| City | Warsaw |
| Period | 21/07/13 → 26/07/13 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To commercialize or not to commercialize genetically modified crops in the EU environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
GMAGRI: Technological innovations in a dynamic institutional environment: introduction of GMOs in (Flemish) agriculture
Inghelbrecht, L. (Former PhD Student) & Dessein, J. (Former Project Manager)
1/10/09 → 19/07/16
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver