TY - JOUR
T1 - Where is the worm? Predictive modelling of the habitat preferences of the tube-building polychaete Lanice conchilega (Pallas, 1766)
AU - Willems, Wouter
AU - Goethals, Peter
AU - Van den Eynde, Dries
AU - Van Hoey, Gert
AU - Van Lancker, Vera
AU - Verfaillie, Els
AU - Vincx, Magda
AU - Degraer, Steven
N1 - 5th European Conference on Ecological Modelling, Pushchino, RUSSIA, SEP 19-23, 2005
PY - 2008/3/24
Y1 - 2008/3/24
N2 - Grab samples to monitor the distribution of marine macrobenthic species (animals >1 mm, living in the sand) are time consuming and give only point based information. If the habitat preference of a species can be modelled, the spatial distribution can be predicted on a full coverage scale from the environmental variables. The modelling techniques Generalized Linear Models (GLM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were compared in their ability to predict the occurrence of Lanice conchilega, a common tube-building polychaete along the North-western European coastline. Although several types of environmental variables were in the data set (granulometric, currents, nutrients) only three granulometric variables were used in the final models (median grain-size, % mud and % coarse fraction). ANN slightly outperformed GLM for a number of performance indicators (% correct predictions, specificity and sensitivity), but the GLM were more robust in the crossvalidation procedure. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - Grab samples to monitor the distribution of marine macrobenthic species (animals >1 mm, living in the sand) are time consuming and give only point based information. If the habitat preference of a species can be modelled, the spatial distribution can be predicted on a full coverage scale from the environmental variables. The modelling techniques Generalized Linear Models (GLM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were compared in their ability to predict the occurrence of Lanice conchilega, a common tube-building polychaete along the North-western European coastline. Although several types of environmental variables were in the data set (granulometric, currents, nutrients) only three granulometric variables were used in the final models (median grain-size, % mud and % coarse fraction). ANN slightly outperformed GLM for a number of performance indicators (% correct predictions, specificity and sensitivity), but the GLM were more robust in the crossvalidation procedure. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.10.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.10.017
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
SN - 0304-3800
VL - 212
SP - 74
EP - 79
JO - Ecological Modelling
JF - Ecological Modelling
IS - 1-2
ER -