Comparison of different spread pattern determination techniques

Simon Cool, Jürgen Vangeyte, Jan G. Pieters , David Nuyttens, Bart Sonck, Jonas Van Damme , Tim Van De Gucht, Koen Mertens

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in Boek/Rapport/CongresprocedureC1: Artikels in proceedings van wetenschappelijke congressen, die niet inbegrepen zijn in A1, A2, A3 of P1peer review


Traditionally, the performance of fertilizer spreaders is assessed using a row of collection trays aligned perpendicular to the driving direction of the tractor. For precise calibration of the spreader this technique, however, does not provide adequate insight into the spreading process since particle distributions are measured in only one spatial dimension. In this paper, two different two dimensional spread pattern determination techniques (SPDT) were tested, each consisting of a sampling method and a matching interpolation algorithm. Tests were executed under similar conditions with three commonly used types of fertilizer (CAN, NPK, KCl) with different physical properties. Results were compared with the traditional technique. The differences found illustrate the importance of using an adequate SPDT to compare spread patterns.
Oorspronkelijke taalEngels
Titel10th European Conference on Precision Agriculture
PublicatiestatusGepubliceerd - 2015
Evenement10th European Conference on Precision Agriculture - , Israël
Duur: 12-jul.-201516-jul.-2015

Dit citeren