TY - JOUR
T1 - Numerical assessment of EMF exposure of a cow to a wireless power transfer system for dairy cattle
AU - Benaissa, Said
AU - M. Samoudi, Amine
AU - Plets , David
AU - Vermeeren , Günter
AU - Verloock , Leen
AU - Minnaert, Ben
AU - Stevens, Nobby
AU - Martens, Luc
AU - Tuyttens, Frank
AU - Sonck, Bart
AU - Joseph, Wout
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - In this paper, we assessed the exposure of a cow to the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) induced by a wireless power transfer (WPT) system working at 92 kHz in a dairy barn. Cow exposure to the radiated EMFs was evaluated and compared to safety guidelines. We modeled a realistic WPT system for dairy cows in Sim4Life, a 3D electromagnetic simulation tool. We validated the model with electric field measurements; simulated fields deviated on average 6% from measured fields. We used the proposed WPT model to evaluate the stimulation and thermal effects based on the internal electric field and the specific absorption rate (SAR), respectively. Results showed that the exposure mainly varied with the distance of the transmitter to the body: variation of 5 dB of the induced electric field when the transmitter was set at 20 cm and 10 cm from the body. The distance of the receiver to the body influenced the exposure less (10%). We also compared the exposure with the limits provided by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The internal electric fields were more conservative than SAR, which showed values far below exposure limits.
AB - In this paper, we assessed the exposure of a cow to the electromagnetic fields (EMFs) induced by a wireless power transfer (WPT) system working at 92 kHz in a dairy barn. Cow exposure to the radiated EMFs was evaluated and compared to safety guidelines. We modeled a realistic WPT system for dairy cows in Sim4Life, a 3D electromagnetic simulation tool. We validated the model with electric field measurements; simulated fields deviated on average 6% from measured fields. We used the proposed WPT model to evaluate the stimulation and thermal effects based on the internal electric field and the specific absorption rate (SAR), respectively. Results showed that the exposure mainly varied with the distance of the transmitter to the body: variation of 5 dB of the induced electric field when the transmitter was set at 20 cm and 10 cm from the body. The distance of the receiver to the body influenced the exposure less (10%). We also compared the exposure with the limits provided by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The internal electric fields were more conservative than SAR, which showed values far below exposure limits.
KW - Dairy health monitoring
KW - Electromagnetic exposure
KW - Induced electric field
KW - Internet-of-animals
KW - Precision livestock farming (PLF)
KW - Specific absorption rate (SAR)
KW - Wireless power transfer
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/numerical-assessment-emf-exposure-cow-wireless-power-transfer-system-dairy-cattle
U2 - 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.017
DO - 10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.017
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
SN - 0168-1699
VL - 151
SP - 219
EP - 225
JO - Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
JF - Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
IS - August 2018
ER -