TY - JOUR
T1 - Point, polygon, or marker?
T2 - In search of the best geographic entity for mapping cultural ecosystem services using the online public participation geographic information systems tool, “My Green Place”
AU - Ramirez Aranda, Mimi
AU - De Waegemaeker, Jeroen
AU - Venhorst, Viktor
AU - Leendertse, Wim
AU - Kerselaers, Eva
AU - Van de Weghe, Nico
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The mapping of cultural ecosystem services through online public participation GIS (PPGIS) has predominantly relied on geographic entities, such as points and polygons, to collect spatial data, regardless of their limitations. As the potential of online PPGIS to support planning and design keeps growing, so does the need for more knowledge about data quality and suitable geographic entities to collect data. Using the online PPGIS tool, “My Green Place,” 449 respondents mapped cultural ecosystem services in Ghent by using all three geographic entities: point, polygon, and the novel “marker.” The three geographic entities’ accuracy was analyzed through a quadrat analysis, regressions against the collective truth, the Akaike information criterion, and a preference test based on the survey’s outcomes. The results show that the point reflects the weakest the collective truth, especially for mapping dynamic cultural practices, and the marker reflects it the strongest. The polygon’s performance compares to that of the marker’s, albeit slightly weaker. The marker delivers a more nuanced image of the respondents’ input, is simpler to use, and has less risk of spatial errors. Therefore, we suggest using the marker instead of the point and the polygon when collecting spatial data in future cultural ecosystem services research.
AB - The mapping of cultural ecosystem services through online public participation GIS (PPGIS) has predominantly relied on geographic entities, such as points and polygons, to collect spatial data, regardless of their limitations. As the potential of online PPGIS to support planning and design keeps growing, so does the need for more knowledge about data quality and suitable geographic entities to collect data. Using the online PPGIS tool, “My Green Place,” 449 respondents mapped cultural ecosystem services in Ghent by using all three geographic entities: point, polygon, and the novel “marker.” The three geographic entities’ accuracy was analyzed through a quadrat analysis, regressions against the collective truth, the Akaike information criterion, and a preference test based on the survey’s outcomes. The results show that the point reflects the weakest the collective truth, especially for mapping dynamic cultural practices, and the marker reflects it the strongest. The polygon’s performance compares to that of the marker’s, albeit slightly weaker. The marker delivers a more nuanced image of the respondents’ input, is simpler to use, and has less risk of spatial errors. Therefore, we suggest using the marker instead of the point and the polygon when collecting spatial data in future cultural ecosystem services research.
KW - Public participation GIS (PPGIS)
KW - cultural ecosystem services (CES)
KW - geographic entity (GE)
KW - green open spaces
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/66bd3425-f2b5-39c3-bf98-2b3a420cfa7d/
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.1949392
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.1949392
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
VL - 48
SP - 491
EP - 511
JO - Cartography and Geographic Information Science
JF - Cartography and Geographic Information Science
IS - 6
ER -