TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening of poultry-pig farms for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
T2 - sampling methodology and within herd prevalence in broiler flocks and pigs
AU - Pletinckx, L J
AU - Verhegghe, Marijke
AU - Dewulf, J
AU - Crombé, F
AU - De Bleecker, Y
AU - Rasschaert, G
AU - Goddeeris, B M
AU - De Man, I
N1 - Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Many reports described the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in different livestock animals from one-species farms. However, in no published reports the prevalence on mixed poultry-pig farms was mentioned, nor the possible relation in MRSA colonization between those two species on one farm, and the possible role of the farmer in the dissemination of MRSA between those two species. Furthermore, no data is available on the optimal sampling site to detect MRSA in broilers. Therefore this study aimed to determine the most suitable sample location in broiler chickens for MRSA and the within flock prevalence of MRSA in various broiler flocks and compared this with the MRSA prevalence in pigs, the colonization of the farmer and the contamination in the barn environment in three mixed poultry-pig farms. MRSA was most frequently isolated from the cloaca and nose shell and to a lesser extent from the skin beneath the wing and the pharynx. The relative sensitivity of the different anatomical sites was, 44.4% for the cloaca, 33.3% for the nose shell, 16.7% for the skin beneath the wing and 5.6% for the pharynx. Based upon these relative sensitivities combining cloaca and nose shell would increase the chance of MRSA detection. A rather low within flock prevalence of MRSA varying between 0% and 28% was detected in broilers, whereas in pigs on the same farms the within herd prevalence varied between 82% and 92%. No MRSA contamination in the direct barn environment of the broilers was found, this in contrast to the environment of the pigs, indicating a relationship between MRSA prevalence and contamination in the environment. Two farmers were continuously colonized, while the third one was only once. In conclusion, a major difference was seen in MRSA occurrence between broilers and pigs from the same farm. This may suggest that broilers are naturally less susceptible to MRSA ST398 colonization than pigs. Conversely, short production time in broilers, vacancy of the barn environment during one week and the higher frequency of disinfection might also explain the lower prevalence in broilers. The farmer may play an important role in the dissemination of MRSA from pigs to poultry, especially in mixed farms where pigs are highly colonized and may act as a reservoir for MRSA ST398 carriage in humans.
AB - Many reports described the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in different livestock animals from one-species farms. However, in no published reports the prevalence on mixed poultry-pig farms was mentioned, nor the possible relation in MRSA colonization between those two species on one farm, and the possible role of the farmer in the dissemination of MRSA between those two species. Furthermore, no data is available on the optimal sampling site to detect MRSA in broilers. Therefore this study aimed to determine the most suitable sample location in broiler chickens for MRSA and the within flock prevalence of MRSA in various broiler flocks and compared this with the MRSA prevalence in pigs, the colonization of the farmer and the contamination in the barn environment in three mixed poultry-pig farms. MRSA was most frequently isolated from the cloaca and nose shell and to a lesser extent from the skin beneath the wing and the pharynx. The relative sensitivity of the different anatomical sites was, 44.4% for the cloaca, 33.3% for the nose shell, 16.7% for the skin beneath the wing and 5.6% for the pharynx. Based upon these relative sensitivities combining cloaca and nose shell would increase the chance of MRSA detection. A rather low within flock prevalence of MRSA varying between 0% and 28% was detected in broilers, whereas in pigs on the same farms the within herd prevalence varied between 82% and 92%. No MRSA contamination in the direct barn environment of the broilers was found, this in contrast to the environment of the pigs, indicating a relationship between MRSA prevalence and contamination in the environment. Two farmers were continuously colonized, while the third one was only once. In conclusion, a major difference was seen in MRSA occurrence between broilers and pigs from the same farm. This may suggest that broilers are naturally less susceptible to MRSA ST398 colonization than pigs. Conversely, short production time in broilers, vacancy of the barn environment during one week and the higher frequency of disinfection might also explain the lower prevalence in broilers. The farmer may play an important role in the dissemination of MRSA from pigs to poultry, especially in mixed farms where pigs are highly colonized and may act as a reservoir for MRSA ST398 carriage in humans.
KW - Animal Husbandry
KW - Animals
KW - Bacterial Typing Techniques
KW - Belgium
KW - Environment
KW - Humans
KW - Livestock
KW - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
KW - Poultry
KW - Staphylococcal Infections
KW - Swine
U2 - 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.07.008
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
C2 - 21782977
SN - 1567-7257
VL - 11
SP - 2133
EP - 2137
JO - Infection, Genetics and Evolution
JF - Infection, Genetics and Evolution
IS - 8
ER -