TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of the so-called ‘superchilling’ technique for the transport of fresh fishery products
AU - Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
AU - Allende, Ana
AU - Alvarez-Ordonez, Avelino
AU - Bolton, Declan
AU - Chemaly, Marianne
AU - Davies, Robert
AU - De Cesare, Alessandra
AU - Herman, Lieve
AU - Hilbert, Friederike
AU - Lindqvist, Roland
AU - Nauta, Maarten
AU - Peixe, Luisa
AU - Ru, Giuseppe
AU - Simmons, Marion
AU - Skandamis, Panagiotis
AU - Suffredini, Elisabetta
AU - Bekaert, Karen
AU - Cropotova, Janna
AU - Garcia, Miriam R.
AU - Messens, Winy
AU - Bover-Cid, Sara
N1 - © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Superchilling entails lowering the fish temperature to between the initial freezing point of the fish and about 1–2°C lower. The temperature of superchilled fresh fishery products (SFFP) in boxes without ice was compared to that of products subject to the currently authorised practice in boxes with ice (CFFP) under the same conditions of on-land storage and/or transport. A heat transfer model was developed and made available as a tool to identify under which initial configurations of SFFP the fish temperature, at any time of storage/transport, is lower or equal to CFFP. A minimum degree of superchilling, corresponding to an ice fraction in the fish matrix of SFFP equal or higher than the proportion of ice added per mass of fish in CFFP, will ensure with 99–100% certainty (almost certain) that the fish temperature of SFFP and the consequent increase of relevant hazards will be lower or equal to that of CFFP. In practice, the degree of superchilling can be estimated using the fish temperature after superchilling and its initial freezing point, which are subject to uncertainties. The tool can be used as part of ‘safety-by-design’ approach, with the reliability of its outcome being dependent on the accuracy of the input data. An evaluation of methods capable of detecting whether a previously frozen fish is commercially presented as ‘superchilled’ was carried out based on, amongst others, their applicability for different fish species, ability to differentiate fresh fish from fish frozen at different temperatures, use as a stand-alone method, ease of use and classification performance. The methods that were considered ‘fit for purpose’ are Hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase (HADH) test, α-glucosidase test, histology, ultraviolet–visible–near–infrared (UV-VIS/NIR) spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging. These methods would benefit from standardisation, including the establishment of threshold values or classification algorithms to provide a practical routine test.
AB - Superchilling entails lowering the fish temperature to between the initial freezing point of the fish and about 1–2°C lower. The temperature of superchilled fresh fishery products (SFFP) in boxes without ice was compared to that of products subject to the currently authorised practice in boxes with ice (CFFP) under the same conditions of on-land storage and/or transport. A heat transfer model was developed and made available as a tool to identify under which initial configurations of SFFP the fish temperature, at any time of storage/transport, is lower or equal to CFFP. A minimum degree of superchilling, corresponding to an ice fraction in the fish matrix of SFFP equal or higher than the proportion of ice added per mass of fish in CFFP, will ensure with 99–100% certainty (almost certain) that the fish temperature of SFFP and the consequent increase of relevant hazards will be lower or equal to that of CFFP. In practice, the degree of superchilling can be estimated using the fish temperature after superchilling and its initial freezing point, which are subject to uncertainties. The tool can be used as part of ‘safety-by-design’ approach, with the reliability of its outcome being dependent on the accuracy of the input data. An evaluation of methods capable of detecting whether a previously frozen fish is commercially presented as ‘superchilled’ was carried out based on, amongst others, their applicability for different fish species, ability to differentiate fresh fish from fish frozen at different temperatures, use as a stand-alone method, ease of use and classification performance. The methods that were considered ‘fit for purpose’ are Hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase (HADH) test, α-glucosidase test, histology, ultraviolet–visible–near–infrared (UV-VIS/NIR) spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging. These methods would benefit from standardisation, including the establishment of threshold values or classification algorithms to provide a practical routine test.
KW - HADH enzymatic test
KW - biological hazards
KW - freezing
KW - fresh fishery products
KW - storage
KW - superchilling
KW - transport
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4b005601-2507-375d-a674-492d70d58970/
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6378
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6378
M3 - Article
C2 - 33552296
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 19
SP - e06378
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 6378
ER -