Unfolding the Black Box of Questionable Research Practices: Where Is the Line between Acceptable and Unacceptable Practices?

Christian Linder, Siavash Farahbakhsh

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftA2: Artikel in een internationaal wetenschappelijk tijdschrift met peer review, dat niet inbegrepen is in A1peer review

Uittreksel

Despite the extensive literature on what questionable research practices (QRPs) are and how to measure them, the normative underpinnings of such practices have remained less explored. QRPs often fall into a grey area of justifiable and unjustifiable practices. Where to precisely draw the line between such practices challenges individual scholars and this harms science. We investigate QRPs from a normative perspective using the theory of communicative action. We highlight the role of the collective in assessing individual behaviours. Our contribution is a framework that allows identification of when particular actions cross over from acceptable to unacceptable practice. Thus, this article provides grounds for developing scientific standards to raise the quality of scientific research.
Oorspronkelijke taalEngels
TijdschriftBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volume30
Exemplaarnummer3
Pagina's (van-tot)335-360
Aantal pagina’s26
ISSN1052-150X
DOI's
PublicatiestatusGepubliceerd - 1-jul-2020

Vingerafdruk

Bekijk de onderzoeksthema's van 'Unfolding the Black Box of Questionable Research Practices: Where Is the Line between Acceptable and Unacceptable Practices?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Dit citeren