TY - JOUR
T1 - Welfare of horses at slaughter
AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
AU - Alvarez, Julio
AU - Boklund, Anette
AU - Dippel, Sabine
AU - Dorea, Fernanda
AU - Figuerola, Jordi
AU - Herskin, Mette
AU - Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel
AU - Nannoni, Eleonora
AU - Nonno, Romolo
AU - Riber, Anja
AU - Stahl, Karl
AU - Stegeman, Jan Arend
AU - Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
AU - Tuyttens, Frank
AU - Winckler, Christoph
AU - Raj, Mohan
AU - Velarde, Antonio
AU - Candiani, Denise
AU - Van der Stede, Yves
AU - Michel, Virginie
PY - 2025/1/28
Y1 - 2025/1/28
N2 - The objective of this Scientific Opinion is to assess the hazards and welfare conse-quences associated with the slaughter of horses for human consumption. The en-tire slaughter procedure, from arrival at the slaughterhouse until death, is dividedinto three phases: Phase 1 – pre-stunning, Phase 2 – stunning and Phase 3 – bleed-ing. Phase 1 includes the following processes (in chronological order): (a) arrival,(b) unloading of the animals from the vehicle, (c) lairage, (d) handling and movingto the stunning area and (e) restraint before application of the stunning method.Phase 2 encompasses the stunning methods, while Phase 3 involves the bleed-ing process (i.e. exsanguination following stunning). Stunning methods for horsesinclude penetrative captive bolt and firearms. Welfare consequences that horsesmay experience (such as handling stress, restriction of movement and injuries) andpotential hazards were identified for all the phases along with preventive and cor-rective measures. For arrival and unloading during phase 1, this Opinion refers toa previous EFSA assessment on the transport of Equidae. Animal-based measures(ABMs) to assess all identified welfare consequences are proposed. A flowchart ofABMs to assess the state of consciousness is provided to allow monitoring dur-ing the stunning and bleeding phase at three key stages ((1) between the end ofstunning and shackling, (2) during neck cutting or sticking, (3) during bleeding).Additionally, specific practices deemed unacceptable on welfare grounds arelisted
AB - The objective of this Scientific Opinion is to assess the hazards and welfare conse-quences associated with the slaughter of horses for human consumption. The en-tire slaughter procedure, from arrival at the slaughterhouse until death, is dividedinto three phases: Phase 1 – pre-stunning, Phase 2 – stunning and Phase 3 – bleed-ing. Phase 1 includes the following processes (in chronological order): (a) arrival,(b) unloading of the animals from the vehicle, (c) lairage, (d) handling and movingto the stunning area and (e) restraint before application of the stunning method.Phase 2 encompasses the stunning methods, while Phase 3 involves the bleed-ing process (i.e. exsanguination following stunning). Stunning methods for horsesinclude penetrative captive bolt and firearms. Welfare consequences that horsesmay experience (such as handling stress, restriction of movement and injuries) andpotential hazards were identified for all the phases along with preventive and cor-rective measures. For arrival and unloading during phase 1, this Opinion refers toa previous EFSA assessment on the transport of Equidae. Animal-based measures(ABMs) to assess all identified welfare consequences are proposed. A flowchart ofABMs to assess the state of consciousness is provided to allow monitoring dur-ing the stunning and bleeding phase at three key stages ((1) between the end ofstunning and shackling, (2) during neck cutting or sticking, (3) during bleeding).Additionally, specific practices deemed unacceptable on welfare grounds arelisted
KW - Equidae
KW - animal-based measures
KW - equine
KW - hazards
KW - horse
KW - preventive/corrective measures
KW - slaughter
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ba5fad4b-bdc8-35a6-b0c3-308816cc23c4/
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9178
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9178
M3 - A1: Web of Science-article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 23
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 1
M1 - e9178
ER -