When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture

Evelien M. de Olde, Henrik Moller, Fleur Marchand, Richard W. McDowell, Catriona J. MacLeod, Marion Sautier, Stephan Halloy, Andrew Barber, Jayson Benge, Christian Bockstaller, Eddie A. M. Bokkers, Imke J. M. de Boer, Katharine A. Legun, Isabelle Le Quellec, Charles Merfield, Frank W. Oudshoorn, John Reid, Christian Schader, Erika Szymanski, Claus A. G. SørensenJay Whitehead, Jon Manhire

    Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschriftA1: Web of Science-artikelpeer review

    Uittreksel

    Sustainability indicators are well recognized for their potential to assess and monitor sustainable development of agricultural systems. A large number of indicators are proposed in various sustainability assessment frameworks, which raises concerns regarding the validity of approaches, usefulness and trust in such frameworks. Selecting indicators requires transparent and well-defined procedures to ensure the relevance and validity of sustainability assessments. The objective of this study, therefore, was to determine whether
    Oorspronkelijke taalEngels
    TijdschriftEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
    Volume19
    Pagina's (van-tot)1327–1342
    Aantal pagina’s16
    ISSN1387-585X
    DOI's
    PublicatiestatusGepubliceerd - 2017

    Trefwoorden

    • B410-landbouwhydrologie

    Vingerafdruk

    Bekijk de onderzoeksthema's van 'When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Dit citeren